TheAntiTerrorist on Corporate Revenue Collection (10 min)

July 8th, 20101:34 am @

0


Who are the ‘investors’…?

http://www.dnb.co.uk/
http://www.dnb.com/us/

These entities are very elusive and are invariably ‘trading’ under some other name. Try (company ‘trading as’) in your searches.

https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/webapp/…
https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/webapp/…

TheAntiTerrorist on Corporate Revenue Collection

Broadcast on 13 October 2008
Hello friends, I am TheAntiTerrorist. Thank you once again for all your messages of support,
your emails and your questions. I have been learning and implementing and preparing my
family for what is to come. As you can see we’ve been talking about this for a year now and
it’s coming into play; the food crisis, the theatre that is the financial crisis, I hope you have
all been storing dried food and studying feverishly.
This particular broadcast will leave you in no doubt as to who is running the show here. Or
at least who’s benefitting from running the show.
Now if all you good police officers who have been contacting me over the last year are still
in any doubt whether you have been reduced to mere revenue collection agents for private
corporations, this episode will clear that up for you, too.
[begin email excerpt graphics]
I get a lot of emails from disillusioned police officers. They’re beginning to see through the
veil. As you can see here there are certain quotes from emails I have received from certain
officers, and if you are the officers themselves watching this video, you will recognise your
own writings. Of course, I’ve not included your names, but I show these emails to prove to
others that there are good cops out there—there are good police officers out there who are
completely and utterly disillusioned about the job, and how the job has changed. I want to
make it clear I am not anti-police—we need the police because unfortunately there are
people out there who do not have the rest of society’s best interests at heart. There are
burglars out there, there are thieves and rapists and they need to be dealt with. We need men
and women out there selflessly protecting the public.
You may well be out there dealing with us in the real world, dealing with the bad guys,
trying to make a difference, but the bottom line is, you are there to generate revenue for a
full-profit organisation
[end email excerpt graphics]
[Begin Dun & Bradstreet graphics]
So how can I confidently assert that police officers are employees of private corporations
doing business on the international markets? Well, to find that information I would go to
somewhere like Dun & Bradstreet.
Dun & Bradstreet touts itself as
“The worlds leading source of commercial information and insight on businesses, enabling
companies to decide with confidence for 167 years. Dun & Bradstreet’s global commercial
database contains more than 130 million business records, providing our customers with
quality business information. This quality information is the foundation of our global
solutions that customers rely on to make critical business decisions…”
Allo, allo, allo, what’s going on ‘ere then? City of London Police, trading as City of London
Police. What is the overall condition of this business? Well above average.
There will be a report like this for every police force in the western world, and you’ll find it
on Dun & Bradstreet if you look hard enough. In some cases it will cost you an arm and a leg
to get these reports but they’re well worth having. And in some cases there will be
information missing with regards to profits, or directors, but here you can see the directors/
proprietors of City of London Police are Bernard Hartie (sp?) and William Taylor. They’re
executives. Of a company. Making money. Doing business on the international markets.
And if any of you were in any doubt as to The Bank of England’s status, you can see she’s
trading as The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street. When did this business start? 1694.
And here is a favourite of mine—Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs—trading on Dun &
Bradstreet as a full-profit organisation. Now you can see there’s lots of information missing
there but they’re definitely registered and commercial piracy is alive and well.
Oh and here’s Experian, another favourite of mine. Both Experian and Equifax, gathering
data and selling it to banks for profit. What authority do these companies have to take that
information from you when they have a county court judgement against them?
What about our local councils, surely they’re government owned, they can’t be private
businesses? Well at least we know the courts couldn’t possibly be private businesses and
making money on the international mar—oh… well, that can’t be good…. Nelson County
Court? Operating as a full-profit business on the international markets?
Oh, and here’s one of the daddies of them all, The Ministry of Justice, trading as Asylum
Immigration Tribunal, Magistrates Courts, the Public Trustee Office—and here’s what’s very
interesting—are there any significant legal proceedings events against this business? A
county court judgement was registered against this business on the 8th of May 2008.
Now I ask you, as a man on the land would you do business with a corporation that has a
black mark against its name like that? It just goes to show you that the story about the judges
and courts being immune is absolute nonsense. Total hooey.
These are private entities and they are just as susceptible to a commercial lien as any other
corporation would be. We’re talking about profit here. There’s money involved, which makes
it a whole new ballgame. Changes the motivation for giving out tickets. Changes the
motivation for making arrests. And it changes the rules entirely, which is why I am revealing
this information to the people who wish to find it.
Whenever there are criminal charges, criminal charges always come by statute. Every time
the legislature passes a criminal ordinance or statute, the purpose of passing it is to raise
revenue for the government. Now the revenue that they’re raising is not the fines that the
courts will collect, no. The fines and the courts are sort of like taxes. Taxes don’t run the
government and the government doesn’t run off the fines, either.
Who do the taxes and the fines go to? The investors. So who the hell are the investors?
Whoever it was that bid and paid the government for the right to collect and use all the fines
and taxes, based on the violation of the statute.
Well then how does the government operate? They pass a statute that says you should not
speed, and then, when they pass that statute they’ve got a bunch of number crunchers in the
background saying, “Well if we put the speed limit at 30 in the towns, and say, 60 in the
country and 70 on the motorways, how many miscreants do you think we might have every
year, and how much money or revenue is that going to generate? Well, we think it might
generate about 3 billion a year or 5 billion a year…” or whatever it is.
And so they pass this statute and the government says, “Okay, we’ve got this statute, how
many of you guys would like to give us a quotation, what would you purchase the income
stream of this statute for? How much would you pay us to collect the revenue from these
statutes and hand that money over to you as a return on your investment?”
These banks bid up and and they say, ‘Well, we’ll give you 5 or 6 billion,’ and they pay the
government up front , that’s what runs the government.
So let me make that perfectly clear. What is collected from the court fines is the revenue
which pays back the interest on the principle to the private banking investors who
bankrolled the government up front.
And which entity is creating the statutes? Oh, look, The House of Commons trading as The
Members of Parliament on Dun & Bradstreet. Starting to see the big picture now, are we?
So as soon as you violate a statute and a traffic ticket goes out, the traffic ticket is the
equivalent of a criminal complaint, which is a negotiable instrument, or a money order.
When a ticket is written and ends up with a clerk of the court, the clerk bundles these up and
they get shipped around, appraised, money is put into the accounts of the local courts—
wherever it may be—and securities go out in the background and somebody has purchased
the right to the revenue stream.
“Yeah, that’s all very well,” I hear you say, “but what does it actually mean?”
Well, it means they’re all private corporate entities. All of them. The courts, the police, the
Houses of Parliament, the councils, all of it, all corporations. And corporations have
shareholders who expect a dividend. They are the motivation for the creation of statutes that
generate fines as revenue. It also means that where statutory legislation is concerned, if
you’re standing in front of a judge or a police officer, you’re dealing with an employee of a
private corporation. You wouldn’t let a McDonald’s employee search you bag, would you?
[Pinhead]
“You are nicked, my son, you are going down. Now, would you like fries with that?”
[Fathead]
“You are under arrest, buddy.”
There’s no difference whatsoever. The only authority they have is what you grant them,
voluntarily or out of pure ignorance. It’s your call.
Yes, you could say they are just doing business, but it is personal.
[disclaimer: Not to be taken as legal advice &c.]
Everything I’ve told you is provable and you can look it up for yourself. I certainly would.
Don’t take my word for it; after all, I’m a guy sitting here in my study wearing a black
balaclava and sunglasses after sundown.
Thanks for listening.
HEO
9 February 2009
© MMIX TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press

TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press would like to take this opportunity to point out that in theselitigious times it’s easy to lose sight of the fact that we—as a community of kindred souls—oncevalued common sense. So cast back in your memory to that long-forgotten concept and embrace thefact that the TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press stand above all for freedom and personalresponsibility. Simply stated, how you apply this information in your own life has nothing to do withus. These transcripts are for education and entertainment purposes only.TheAntiTerrorist on Corporate Revenue CollectionBroadcast on 13 October 2008Hello friends, I am TheAntiTerrorist. Thank you once again for all your messages of support,your emails and your questions. I have been learning and implementing and preparing myfamily for what is to come. As you can see we’ve been talking about this for a year now andit’s coming into play; the food crisis, the theatre that is the financial crisis, I hope you haveall been storing dried food and studying feverishly.This particular broadcast will leave you in no doubt as to who is running the show here. Orat least who’s benefitting from running the show.Now if all you good police officers who have been contacting me over the last year are stillin any doubt whether you have been reduced to mere revenue collection agents for privatecorporations, this episode will clear that up for you, too.[begin email excerpt graphics]I get a lot of emails from disillusioned police officers. They’re beginning to see through theveil. As you can see here there are certain quotes from emails I have received from certainofficers, and if you are the officers themselves watching this video, you will recognise yourown writings. Of course, I’ve not included your names, but I show these emails to prove toothers that there are good cops out there—there are good police officers out there who arecompletely and utterly disillusioned about the job, and how the job has changed. I want tomake it clear I am not anti-police—we need the police because unfortunately there arepeople out there who do not have the rest of society’s best interests at heart. There areburglars out there, there are thieves and rapists and they need to be dealt with. We need menand women out there selflessly protecting the public.You may well be out there dealing with us in the real world, dealing with the bad guys,trying to make a difference, but the bottom line is, you are there to generate revenue for afull-profit organisation[end email excerpt graphics][Begin Dun & Bradstreet graphics]So how can I confidently assert that police officers are employees of private corporationsdoing business on the international markets? Well, to find that information I would go tosomewhere like Dun & Bradstreet.Dun & Bradstreet touts itself as“The worlds leading source of commercial information and insight on businesses, enablingcompanies to decide with confidence for 167 years. Dun & Bradstreet’s global commercialdatabase contains more than 130 million business records, providing our customers withquality business information. This quality information is the foundation of our globalsolutions that customers rely on to make critical business decisions…”Allo, allo, allo, what’s going on ‘ere then? City of London Police, trading as City of LondonPolice. What is the overall condition of this business? Well above average.There will be a report like this for every police force in the western world, and you’ll find iton Dun & Bradstreet if you look hard enough. In some cases it will cost you an arm and a legto get these reports but they’re well worth having. And in some cases there will beinformation missing with regards to profits, or directors, but here you can see the directors/proprietors of City of London Police are Bernard Hartie (sp?) and William Taylor. They’reexecutives. Of a company. Making money. Doing business on the international markets.And if any of you were in any doubt as to The Bank of England’s status, you can see she’strading as The Old Lady of Threadneedle Street. When did this business start? 1694.And here is a favourite of mine—Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs—trading on Dun &Bradstreet as a full-profit organisation. Now you can see there’s lots of information missingthere but they’re definitely registered and commercial piracy is alive and well.Oh and here’s Experian, another favourite of mine. Both Experian and Equifax, gatheringdata and selling it to banks for profit. What authority do these companies have to take thatinformation from you when they have a county court judgement against them?What about our local councils, surely they’re government owned, they can’t be privatebusinesses? Well at least we know the courts couldn’t possibly be private businesses andmaking money on the international mar—oh… well, that can’t be good…. Nelson CountyCourt? Operating as a full-profit business on the international markets?Oh, and here’s one of the daddies of them all, The Ministry of Justice, trading as AsylumImmigration Tribunal, Magistrates Courts, the Public Trustee Office—and here’s what’s veryinteresting—are there any significant legal proceedings events against this business? Acounty court judgement was registered against this business on the 8th of May 2008.Now I ask you, as a man on the land would you do business with a corporation that has ablack mark against its name like that? It just goes to show you that the story about the judgesand courts being immune is absolute nonsense. Total hooey.These are private entities and they are just as susceptible to a commercial lien as any othercorporation would be. We’re talking about profit here. There’s money involved, which makesit a whole new ballgame. Changes the motivation for giving out tickets. Changes themotivation for making arrests. And it changes the rules entirely, which is why I am revealingthis information to the people who wish to find it.Whenever there are criminal charges, criminal charges always come by statute. Every timethe legislature passes a criminal ordinance or statute, the purpose of passing it is to raiserevenue for the government. Now the revenue that they’re raising is not the fines that thecourts will collect, no. The fines and the courts are sort of like taxes. Taxes don’t run thegovernment and the government doesn’t run off the fines, either.Who do the taxes and the fines go to? The investors. So who the hell are the investors?Whoever it was that bid and paid the government for the right to collect and use all the finesand taxes, based on the violation of the statute.Well then how does the government operate? They pass a statute that says you should notspeed, and then, when they pass that statute they’ve got a bunch of number crunchers in thebackground saying, “Well if we put the speed limit at 30 in the towns, and say, 60 in thecountry and 70 on the motorways, how many miscreants do you think we might have everyyear, and how much money or revenue is that going to generate? Well, we think it mightgenerate about 3 billion a year or 5 billion a year…” or whatever it is.And so they pass this statute and the government says, “Okay, we’ve got this statute, howmany of you guys would like to give us a quotation, what would you purchase the incomestream of this statute for? How much would you pay us to collect the revenue from thesestatutes and hand that money over to you as a return on your investment?”These banks bid up and and they say, ‘Well, we’ll give you 5 or 6 billion,’ and they pay thegovernment up front , that’s what runs the government.So let me make that perfectly clear. What is collected from the court fines is the revenuewhich pays back the interest on the principle to the private banking investors whobankrolled the government up front.And which entity is creating the statutes? Oh, look, The House of Commons trading as TheMembers of Parliament on Dun & Bradstreet. Starting to see the big picture now, are we?So as soon as you violate a statute and a traffic ticket goes out, the traffic ticket is theequivalent of a criminal complaint, which is a negotiable instrument, or a money order.When a ticket is written and ends up with a clerk of the court, the clerk bundles these up andthey get shipped around, appraised, money is put into the accounts of the local courts—wherever it may be—and securities go out in the background and somebody has purchasedthe right to the revenue stream.“Yeah, that’s all very well,” I hear you say, “but what does it actually mean?”Well, it means they’re all private corporate entities. All of them. The courts, the police, theHouses of Parliament, the councils, all of it, all corporations. And corporations haveshareholders who expect a dividend. They are the motivation for the creation of statutes thatgenerate fines as revenue. It also means that where statutory legislation is concerned, ifyou’re standing in front of a judge or a police officer, you’re dealing with an employee of aprivate corporation. You wouldn’t let a McDonald’s employee search you bag, would you?[Pinhead]“You are nicked, my son, you are going down. Now, would you like fries with that?”[Fathead]“You are under arrest, buddy.”There’s no difference whatsoever. The only authority they have is what you grant them,voluntarily or out of pure ignorance. It’s your call.Yes, you could say they are just doing business, but it is personal.[disclaimer: Not to be taken as legal advice &c.]Everything I’ve told you is provable and you can look it up for yourself. I certainly would.Don’t take my word for it; after all, I’m a guy sitting here in my study wearing a blackbalaclava and sunglasses after sundown.

Thanks for listening.
—————————————————————————————————-

HEO9 February 2009© MMIX TheAntiTerrorist & Velluminous Press

A heads-up:
The AntiTerrorist Hand book is available worldwide on all Amazon sites

UK: http://tinyurl.com/mwgmjo
US: http://tinyurl.com/mpauum
At least there’s no problem with the audio levels. 🙂

Visit the AT store on CafePress.No profits are taken from the sale of cafepress products
http://www.cafepress.com/THEANTIT

The AT Handbook:
UK: http://tinyurl.com/mwgmjo
US: http://tinyurl.com/mpauum
CA: http://tinyurl.com/y9c5qdk

TheAntiTerrorist on Corporate Revenue Collection

Share